Cases 11 - 20 of 238
Bradley Clark v. R. Keyes
as 23-2262
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRADLEY CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
R. D. KEYES
Eric Ericson v. Steven Woloszyk, et al
as 23-1848
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN R. WOLOSZYK, RICHARD P. CLARK and RICK T. MURAWSKI, also known as RICHARD TULIA MURAWSKI
Robert Carr, Jr. v. Jason Baranek, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CARR, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON BARANEK and DAVID A. CLARKE, JR.
Federal Firearms Licensees of Illinois, et al v. Jay R. Pritzker, et al
as 23-1828
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES OF ILLINOIS, GUNS SAVE LIFE, GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JAY R. PRITZKER, Governor of the State of Illinois, KWAME RAOUL, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and BRENDAN F. KELLY, Director of the Illinois State Police
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
William Clark, III v. St. Croix County, Wisconsin, et al
as 23-1442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM H. CLARK, III
Defendant / Appellee:
ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN, STATE OF WISCONSIN, PROSECUTION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1525
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Ernest Clark
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERNEST F. CLARK
Jean Fukama-Kabika v. Tiffanie Clark
as 23-1222
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEAN A. FUKAMA-KABIKA
Respondent / Appellee:
TIFFANIE CLARK
Shawn Spottswood v. St. Croix County, Wisconsin
as 22-2926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN SPOTTSWOOD, also known as SHAWN CLARKE SPOTTSWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
ST. CROIX COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Justin Clark v. John Galipeau
as 22-2927
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN JAMES EUGENE CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GALIPEAU, Warden, Westville Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.