Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Harold Robinson v. David A. Clarke, Jr., et al
as 15-1961
Petitioner - Appellant:
HAROLD ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLINA STARK, Judge, DAVID A. CLARKE, JR., Sheriff and J. B. VAN HOLLEN, Attorney General
John Jackson v. Tom Barrett, et al
as 15-1112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JERMAINE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM BARRETT, SCOTT WALKER, DAVID A. CLARKE, JR. and others
Steven Johnson v. David Clarke, Jr., et al
as 14-3682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. CLARKE, JR., Sheriff and DEBRA BURMIESTER
James Smith, Jr. v. David Clarke, Jr.
as 14-1733
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES A. SMITH, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID A. CLARKE, JR.
Robert Tatum v. David Clarke, Jr., et al
as 14-1007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT L. TATUM
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. CLARKE, JR., KEVIN NYKLEWICZ, PETER JASKULSKI, Captain and others
Roderick Douglas v. David Clarke, et al
as 13-3882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK DOUGLAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. CLARKE, JR., Sheriff, ADAM PERL, L. BROOKS and others
Estate of James Franklin Perry, et al v. Cheryl Wenzel, et al
as 13-8022
Petitioner:
ESTATE OF JAMES FRANKLIN PERRY, BETTIE A. RODGERS, Special Administrator and JAMES F. PERRY, JR., a minor
Respondent:
CHERYL WENZEL, DEPUTY KICKBUSH, NICOLE VIRGO and others
Da Vonte Love v. David A. Clarke, Jr., et al
as 13-2426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DA VONTE LOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID A. CLARK, JR., PETER ERICKSON, Green Bay Correctional Institution Security Director, RICHARD SCHMIDT, Inspector and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Norris Pegues v. Francis Springbob, et al
as 13-1205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORRIS E. PEGUES
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCIS C. SPRINGBOB, JAMES BRUNO, CITY OF GREENFIELD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
