Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. John Varga, et al
as 20-2645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Ashoor Rasho v. John Doe 1, et al
as 20-2415
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASHOOR RASHO
Montez Dunklin v. Doctor Bemesida, et al
as 20-2417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTEZ DUNKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, 1 male nurse, DOCTOR BEMESIDA, JANE DOES, 2 female nurses and others
Calvin Williams v. Sergeant Bowen, et al
as 19-3508
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, #2 Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE, #1 correctional officer and SERGEANT BOWEN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN WILLIAMS
Peter Gakuba v. Kristie Otey, et al
as 19-3019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHELLE NEESE, Acting Warden of Robinson Correctional Center, JANE DOE #2, JANE DOE #3 and others
Michael Lee v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 19-2013
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, JOHN DOE, Classification Officer, JOHN DOE 2, Classification Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LEE
Michael Lee v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 19-1989
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, JOHN DOE, Classification Officer, JOHN DOE 2, Classification Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. LEE
Pedro Donaldson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 19-1115
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 2, Officer, CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEDRO DONALDSON
Harvey Larson v. City of Kenosha, Wisconsin, et al
as 18-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARVEY E. LARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KENOSHA, WISCONSIN, JOHN DOE 1, sued as Public Defender John Doe, JOHN DOE 2, sued as Prosecutor John Doe and others
Reginald Tolbert, Jr. v. John Doe 1, et al
as 18-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD L. TOLBERT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, Officer 1, JOHN DOE 2, Officer 2 and JOHN DOE 3, Officer 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
