Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Vincent George, Jr. v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 16-3754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT M. GEORGE, JR., also known as George Vincent, also known as Abdul Alim Hajar
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of IDOC, WARDEN HODGES, JANIS JOKISCH and others
Vincent George, Jr. v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 16-1623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT M. GEORGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, WARDEN HODGES, MATTHEW MAYFIELD and others
Don Meadows v. Rockford Housing Authority, et al
as 15-3897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON MEADOWS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROCKFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY, LARRY HODGES and JOHN M. NOVAY
Kenneth Cebertowicz v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 15-3062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. CEBERTOWICZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director of Illinois Department of Corrections, MARC HODGE, Warden of Lawrence Correctional Center, DAVID R. VAUGHN, Chaplain of Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Emma Hodge v. USA
as 15-1182
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMMA DELL HODGE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Emma Hodge v. USA
as 15-1015
Petitioner - Appellant:
EMMA DELL HODGE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roderic Hodge, Jr. v. Chad Kolitwenzew, et al
as 14-2796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERIC T. HODGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHAD KOLITWENZEW, SHERIFF BAYSTON, MARLIN WOODS and others
Richard Hodges v. Parthasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 14-2406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD HODGES
Defendant - Appellee:
PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor, IMOTEP CARTER, Doctor, SALEH OBAISI, Doctor and others
Marshall Petty v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 14-2104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL L. PETTY
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Director Illinois Department of Corrections, MARC HODGE, Warden of Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
