Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Leonard Fuqua v. USPS, et al
as 18-2415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD FUQUA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
NLRB v. USPS
as 18-2267
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
R. Johnson v. DVA, et al
as 17-1181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R. WAYNE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
NLRB v. USPS
as 16-3797
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Ede Warner, Jr. v. Hilary Brown, et al
as 16-3136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDE WARNER, JR., President and COO, Greater Decisions Consulting, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
HILARY BROWN, Marion County Prosecutor's Office, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION, MIKE O'CONNELL, Jefferson County, KY Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leonard Fuqua v. Megan Brennan, et al
as 15-3226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD FUQUA
Defendant - Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her official capacity and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Chicago District Office, sue in its official capacity as a mail distribution center funded by the United States Government operating and existing under the laws of the State Government under the laws of the State of Illinois
Raymond Milota, Jr. v. USPS
as 15-2969
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND R. MILOTA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
