Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Robert Simmons v. Cook County Jail, et al
as 13-2746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A. SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY JAIL, THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff and MARIO REYES, Superintendent
Lance Hall v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 13-2666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE EUGENE HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Head Sheriff Cook County and DIRECTOR OF COOK COUNTY JAIL
Lance Hall v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 13-2627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE EUGENE HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, DIRECTOR OF COOK COUNTY JAIL and T. EVERHART, Superintendent
Gregory Wright v. Toni Preckwinkle, et al
as 13-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
TONI PRECKWINKLE and COOK COUNTY JAIL
Louis Hall v. Cook County Jail, et al
as 13-1082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY JAIL, STATE OF ILLINOIS and TONI PREPWINKLE
Bennie Ellison v. Cook County Jail, et al
as 12-2307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE K. ELLISON
Defendant - Appellee:
COOK COUNTY JAIL, DANIEL MORECI, LEWIS HOVEL and others
Shaun Brame v. Thomas J. Dart, et al
as 11-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN BRAME
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Cook County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Executive Director, in his individual and official capacities, SUPERINTENDENT ANDREWS, Cook County Jail, in his individual and official capacities and others
Shaun Brame v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 10-3831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAUN BRAME
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois and CCDOC, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, Executive Director of Cook County Jail, CHESTER PLAXICO, Superintendent of Division (10) Cook County Illinois, CCDOC Star #114 and others
Romeo Ezike v. Amtrak, et al
as 08-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROMEO EZIKE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMTRAK, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, COOK COUNTY JAIL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
