Cases 31 - 40 of 418
James Zeas v. Jason Garnett
as 23-1767
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES J. ZEAS
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON GARNETT, Chief of Parole for the Illinois Department of Corrections
Anthony Rodesky v. Rob Jeffreys
as 23-1403
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTHONY RODESKY
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB JEFFREYS, in his official capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Anthony Rodesky v. Rob Jeffreys
as 23-1509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY RODESKY
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, in his official capacity as Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections
Joshua Hargrow v. Stateville Correctional Center, et al
as 23-1258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA HARGROW
Defendant / Appellee:
STATEVILLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DIXON CORRECTIONAL CENTER and COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Christopher Gilmore v. Nurse San Andres, et al
as 23-1198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GILMORE
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE SAN ANDRES, C.O. SEENAUTH, SERGEANT SKINNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Darius Printup v. Indiana Department of Correction, et al
as 23-1292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., FRANK VANIHEL and others
Marshall Cobb, Sr. v. State of Indiana, et al
as 23-1354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARSHALL T. COBB, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Richard Johnson v. Regional Chief
as 23-1053
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD A. JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
REGIONAL CHIEF, Unit 517, Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Probation and Parole
Jasper Frazier v. Christina Reagle
as 22-2980
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASPER FRAZIER
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
