Cases 31 - 40 of 144
Paul Ammerman v. Kaleb Singleton, et al
as 19-3304
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL MURPHY, Doctor, SHANE HINTON, LARRY FUCHS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL D. AMMERMAN
Consuela Smith-Williams, et al v. USA
as 19-8013
Petitioner:
ROBERT RISTOW, ROGER SUHR, FRED RIVERS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Matthew Stechauner v. Patrick Murphy, et al
as 19-1976
Defendant / Appellee:
TROY SHEIDE, GARY NEAU, PATRICK MURPHY, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW C. STECHAUNER
Martin Murphy, et al v. Walworth County, Wisconsin
as 19-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STAY LAKE GENEVA, INC. and MARTIN J. MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
WALWORTH COUNTY, WISCONSIN
Antonio Crawford v. Matthew Kennelly, et al
as 19-1841
Defendant / Appellee:
M. MURPHY, UNKNOWN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD
Phillip Littler v. Blake McDonald, et al
as 18-2471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP M. LITTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE MCDONALD, STEPHEN MURPHY, ISRAEL BREWER and others
Edith Brown v. City of Chicago, et al
as 18-2338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, BRIAN MURPHY, Officer, Star #10079, JENNIFER UZUBELL, Officer, Star #16637 and others
Sauk Prairie Conservation Alli v. DOI, et al
as 18-2213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAUK PRAIRIE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, RYAN ZINKE, In his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and others
Sauk Prairie Conservation Alli v. DOI, et al
as 18-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAUK PRAIRIE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, RYAN ZINKE, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Interior, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
