Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Deonta Kyles v. Latonya Williams, et al
as 15-3401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEONTA KYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
LATONYA WILLIAMS, PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor, JOSEPH SHEEHY and others
Jose Arce v. Jennifer Barnes, et al
as 15-3276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE CARLOS ARCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER BARNES, as a private individual, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and CORIZON, LLC, Indiana Department of Corrections as real party in interest
Cleatus Furlong v. Richard Brown, et al
as 15-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEATUS FURLONG
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, Superintendent, sued in individual capacity, SARAH CHAPMAN, SARAH CHAPMAN CAB Hearing Officer, sued in individual capacity, BEVERLY GILMORE, Case Work Manager, sued in individual capacity and others
Carol Sissom v. Robert Snow, et al
as 14-3355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAROL L. SISSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT L. SNOW, individually, BERKLEY PUBLISHING GROUP, PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC. and others
Shane Kervin v. La Clair Barnes, et al
as 14-2983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE KERVIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LA CLAIR BARNES, APRIL VALDEZ, Gievance-Specialist, SERGEANT GAPSKI and others
Orvil Hassebrock, et al v. Robert Bernhoft, et al
as 14-2943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORVIL D. HASSEBROCK and EVELYN HASSEBROCK
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT G. BERNHOFT, BERNHOFT LAW FIRM, SC, ROBERT E. BARNES and others
USA v. David Barnes
as 13-3676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID N. BARNES
Marlyn Barnes v. USA
as 13-3623
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARLYN J. BARNES
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Darell Bolden v. Berneita Barne
as 13-3563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARELL W. BOLDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNEITA BARNES, Counselor
Frank Jones v. Kenneth White, et al
as 13-2841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK S. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH WHITE and CLAIR BARNES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
