Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Randy McCaa v. Todd Hamilton, et al
as 16-4209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY MCCAA
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD HAMILTON, Doctor, KIMBERLY MCKOWN, Doctor, AMY ZIRBEL, Doctor and others
Jarrett Hamilton v. City of New Albany, Indiana, et al
as 16-3901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARRETT HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEW ALBANY, INDIANA, PAUL SPEIGHTS, DAVID BREWER and others
Robert Hamilton v. Don Strahota
as 16-3859
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT L. HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
DON STRAHOTA, Warden
Reginald Pittman v. Madison County, Illinois, et al
as 16-3291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD PITTMAN, by and through his guardian and next friend, ROBIN M. HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ROBERT HERTZ, Sheriff, RANDY EATON, Sergeant and others
Darryl Conway v. Michael Reagan, et al
as 15-2801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL A. CARLOS CONWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. REAGAN, Judge, THOMAS V. GAINER, Judge, DAVID F. HAMILTON, Judge and others
Board of Education of the City v. Chicago Teachers Union, Local, et al
as 15-8013
Petitioner:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Respondent:
CHICAGO TEACHERS UNION, LOCAL NO. 1, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO, TERRI FELLS, LILLIAN EDMONDS and others
Demarco Taylor v. Helen Hamilton, et al
as 15-2105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMARCO L. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN HAMILTON, ANGELICA JOYNER, Correctional Officer, GRIEVANCE OFFICER HASTINGS and others
Darryl Hamilton v. Tarry William
as 15-2068
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center
Charles Hamilton v. Kevin Bird
as 15-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BIRD, unknown employee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
