Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Ronald P. Lane v. William Pollard
as 11-3178
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD P. LANE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM POLLARD
Michael Scott v. Columbia Correctional Institu, et al
as 11-2585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
COLUMBIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, I.C.E. Department, Health Service Unit, JOANNE LANE, Lieutenant, KIM CAMBELL and others
Dwight Miller, et al v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Com
as 10-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWIGHT MILLER, WELLS ANDERSON, GENE KING and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. PAUL MERCURY
Jeffrey Reiniche, et al v. Jamie Martin, et al
as 10-3753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY S. REINICHE, ARTHUR CHAUSMER, Doctor and GARY POST, derivatively on behalf of HEALTH ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC., derivatively on behalf of HA HOLDINGS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE MARTIN, CURTIS S. LANE, ANDREW M. PAUL and others
Christopher Lane v. Phil Reidda
as 10-2803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY SCHLOSS and CHRISTOPHER LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL REIDDA, MARK AGHAKHAN, MARTHA BELLEW-SMITH and others
Anthony Lane v. Eliot House Condominium Associ, et al
as 10-1692
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIOT HOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION and LOCAL 727 TEAMSTERS
John Lane-El v. Mark Sevier
as 09-3911
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN R. LANE-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent
Hugh Beech v. Latoya Lane
as 09-3186
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUGH D. BEECH
Respondent - Appellee:
MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent and LATOYA LANE
Donald Woodruff, Jr. v. Illinois Department of Correct, et al
as 09-3003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD WOODRUFF, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHAEL P. LANE, ROGER E. WALKER, JR. and others
Lane Baxter v. Judy Smith
as 09-2274
Petitioner - Appellant:
LANE B. BAXTER
Respondent - Appellee:
JUDY P. SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
