Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Bryant Tillman
as 22-1590
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRYANT TILLMAN
Stanley Tillman v. USA
as 17-2321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY TILLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tillman Liggins v. Carolyn Colvin
as 14-1339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TILLMAN LIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Martell Tillman v. Harold Lewis, et al
as 11-3455
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTELL TILLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD LEWIS, NEIL SHELTON, JOHN DOE and others
Michael Tillman v. Timothy Frenzer
as 11-2788
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL TILLMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
TIMOTHY J. FRENZER
Integrated Genomics, Incorpora v. Tillman Gerngross
as 09-3718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTEGRATED GENOMICS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
TILLMAN GERNGROSS
Donald Davis v. Robert Spoden, et al
as 09-2211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD W. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT D. SPODEN, Rock County Sheriff, BARBARA TILLMAN, Chief Deputy, BEYER, Sergeant and others
Chitunda Tillman v. Newline Cinema, et al
as 09-1778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHITUNDA TILLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NEWLINE CINEMA, and its officers, ROBERT K. SHAYE, Co-Chairman sued in both individually and in his official capacities, MICHAEL LYNNE, Co-Chief Executive Officer sued in both individually and in his official capacities and others
Chitunda Tillman, et al v. Newline Cinema, et al
as 09-1636
Plaintiff:
CHITUNDA TILLMAN
Appellant:
BRIAN T. NIX
Defendant - Appellee:
NEWLINE CINEMA, MICHAEL LYNNE, Co-Chief Executive Officer sued in both individually and in his official capacities, ROBERT K. SHAYE, Co-Chairman sued in both individually and in his official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
