Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DeAndre Slate v. Makes Cents, Inc., et al
as 23-2232
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEANDRE SLATE, on behalf of Plaintiff and the class members described below
Defendant / Appellant:
MAKES CENTS, INC., doing business as MAXLEND, UETSA TSAKITS, INC., CANE BAY PARTNERS VI, LLLP and others
David Johnson v. UAL, et al
as 19-1785
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation and UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
UAL, et al v. David Johnson
as 19-8008
Respondent:
DAVID JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
Petitioner:
UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation and UNITED AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation
USA v. David Johnson
as 15-3830
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID JOHNSON
Elijah Reid v. Joseph Durham, et al
as 15-2002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIJAH REID
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH DURHAM, DAVID JOHNSON, JEFFREY C. MILLER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Saeed Younger v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 11-2139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAEED YOUNGER
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, U. REES, Shift Supervisor, JODI SUHRE and others
Paul Smith v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 09-2929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, CHARLES PARNELL, DAVID JOHNSON and others
Paul Smith v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 09-2657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, CHARLES PARNELL, DAVID JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
