Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kiontae Mack v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIONTAE MACK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, PAUL MADERER, Detective, Star No. 21246, DAVID ROBERTS, Detective, Star No. 20764 and others
David Bentz v. Nathan Maue, et al
as 21-1379
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM QUALLS, MICHAEL SCHNICKER, NATHAN MAUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
David Bentz v. Mike Moldenhauser, et al
as 20-1937
Defendant / Appellee:
HOLLY HAWKINS, MIKE MOLDENHAUSER, ERIN MEARS-ATTIG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
David Bentz v. Donald Lindenberg, et al
as 19-2564
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD LINDENBERG, C/O, Menard CC, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Assistant Warden, Menard CC and VIRGIL SMITH, C/O, Menard CC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
David Bentz v. Steven Newbold
as 19-1776
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN M. NEWBOLD, Doctor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
David Bentz v. Salvador Godinez, et al
as 18-1684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, DONALD STOLWORTHY, GLADYSE TAYLOR and others
David Bentz v. William Qualls, et al
as 17-1728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM QUALLS, MICHAEL SAMUEL, KENT BROOKMAN, Lieutenant and others
David Bentz v. Nathaniel Maue, et al
as 17-1729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL MAUE, Correctional Officer, WILLIAM QUALLS, ADAM TOPE and others
David Bentz v. Parthasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 16-1697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor, CHRISTINE LUCE and JOHN & JANE DOES, #1-#6
David Bentz v. Randy Pfister, et al
as 15-1733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY PFISTER, Chief Administrator of Pontiac Correctional Center, JAMES S. BLACKARD, Major at Pontiac Correctional Center, SUSAN PRENTICE, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
