Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Logan Dyjak v. Stacey Horstman, et al
as 24-1675
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
STACEY HORSTMAN, JO-AN LYNN and LANA MILLER
Charles Thornton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. THORNTON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., MARY JO ZIMMER, Nurse Practitioner, HCU at Menard CC and MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI
Walter Moffett v. Michael Dittman, et al
as 24-1023
Plaintiff:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. DITTMAN, SECURITY DIRECTOR WEBBER, MICHAEL BUETTNER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Willie Hall v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 22-1572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., FRANK LAWERENCE, Ex Warden, ANTHONY WILLIS and others
Logan Dyjak v. Jo-An Lynn, et al
as 21-3212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA WILKERSON, STACEY HORSTMAN, HARVEY DANIELS and others
Bobbie Jo Scholz v. USA, et al
as 20-2163
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX AZAR, II, United States Secretary of Health and Human Services and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBIE JO SCHOLZ
Peggy Jo Smith v. Professional Transportation,, et al
as 20-2046
Defendant / Appellee:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED and RONALD D. ROMAIN, individually and as president and secretary of PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEGGY JO SMITH
Kathryn Harris v. Andrew Saul
as 20-1687
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHRYN JO HARRIS
FDIC v. Chicago Title Insurance Compa, et al
as 20-1572
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, CHICAGO TITLE & TRUST COMPANY, JO JO REAL ESTATE ENTERPRISES, LLC., doing business as PROPERTY VALUATION SERVICES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for FOUNDERS BANK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
