Cases 1 - 10 of 216
Robert F. Mulligan v. Board of Trustees of Indiana University, et al
as 24-1923
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. MULLIGAN
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY, KATHRYN GIRTEN, in her official and individual capacities and MICHELLE MALOTT, in her official and individual capacities
Lennie Perry v. Charles W. Mulaney, et al
as 24-1792
Petitioner:
LENNIE PERRY
Respondent:
CHARLES W. MULANEY, MICHELLE MARIE PETERSEN, JOHN DOE, U.S. Marshal and others
Michelle Hagen v. Fond du Lac School District
as 24-1688
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE HAGEN
Defendant:
FOND DU LAC SCHOOL DISTRICT
Andreas Moore, Jr. v. Michelle Hoffman
as 24-1586
Petitioner:
ANDREAS L. MOORE, JR.
Respondent:
MICHELLE HOFFMAN
Andreas Moore, Jr. v. Michelle Hoffman
as 24-1561
Petitioner:
ANDREAS L. MOORE, JR.
Respondent:
MICHELLE HOFFMAN
Brian Futch, et al v. Jay Pritzker, et al
as 24-1536
Plaintiff:
BRIAN FUTCH, JEFFREY BROWN, RICHARD LEDBETTER and others
Defendant:
JAY R. PRITZKER, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Illinois, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES and others
Ademeko Maclin-Carney v. Ashley Warner, et al
as 24-1110
Plaintiff:
ADEMEKO MACLIN-CARNEY
Defendant:
ASHLEY WARNER, MICHELLE STINE, WENDY DIERECKS and others
Jane Doe v. University of Chicago, et al
as 23-3070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER, SAUL LEVMORE and others
Jason Edmonson v. Mariah Marcell, et al
as 23-3073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON L. EDMONSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIAH MARCELL, Correctional Officer, JAMES ELSINGER, Captain, JOHN KIND and others
Eddie Hatch, Jr., et al v. Tom Barrett, et al
as 23-3051
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDDIE L. HATCH, JR. and MICHELLE DAVIS-HATCH
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM BARRETT, JEFF HANEWALL, ANGELIQUE L. SHARPE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
