Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Richard Gardipee v. Brown County Sheriff, et al
as 23-3273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD THOMAS GARDIPEE
Defendant / Appellee:
BROWN COUNTY SHERIFF, BROWN COUNTY JAIL, ANTHONY EVERS and others
Michael Gorbey v. Mark Morgan, et al
as 22-3045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK MORGAN, Medical Doctor, USP Thomson, THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Arthur Beatty, Sr. v. Chaplain Hinshaw, et al
as 22-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BEATTY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAPLAIN HINSHAW and COUNSELOR HOOLEY
Leonard Standifer v. Chaplain Blummer
as 21-3313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONARD STANDIFER
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAPLAIN BLUMMER
Jeremy Greene v. Chaplain Teslik, et al
as 21-2154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY T. GREENE
Defendant / Appellee:
CINDY O'DONNELL, CHAPLAIN TESLIK, KEVIN CARR and others
Travis Weston v. John Baldwin, et al
as 20-2642
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Chief Administrative Officer/Warden, Menard CC, LLOYD HANNA, Registered Dietician, Menard CC, HOWARD HARNER, Licensed and/or Ordained Chaplain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS D. WESTON, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, also known as Nafiabdul Basir
Arthur Beatty, Sr. v. Chaplain Henshaw, et al
as 19-2764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BEATTY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAPLAIN HENSHAW, COUNSELOR HOOLEY and UTAH DOCKERY, Inmate #143189
Shawn Riley v. David Ewing
as 19-1279
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID EWING, Chaplain
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN RILEY
Peter Gakuba v. Justin Harvey, et al
as 18-1600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN HARVEY, CAFETERIA SUPERVISOR HARVEY, CHAPLAIN PUGH and others
Nathan Jacobs v. S. Julian, et al
as 17-2329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN E. JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. JULIAN, Assistant Warden, SCOTT P. BONHAM, Chaplain and D. SWEENEY, Unit Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
