Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Francisco Vazquez-Rodriguez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 22-2997
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO VAZQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Epigmenio Gatica
as 22-2743
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EPIGMENIO VAZQUEZ GATICA
Armando Vazquez-Salinas v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-3323
Petitioner:
ARMANDO VAZQUEZ-SALINAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Fernando Ramirez-Vazquez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-2030
Petitioner:
FERNANDO RAMIREZ-VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
William Vazquez v. Mason Manor Condominium Associ, et al
as 18-2898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM VAZQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MASON MANOR CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, KOVITZ SHIFRIN NESBIT and CROSSROADS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LLC
Ivan Vazquez-Gonzalez v. USA
as 18-1762
Petitioner - Appellant:
IVAN VAZQUEZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John McGlasson, Jr. v. BYB Extreme Fighting Series,, et al
as 17-2240
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN B. MCGLASSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
BYB EXTREME FIGHTING SERIES, LLC, MICHAEL VAZQUEZ and DHAFIR HARRIS
Brad Janikowski v. Abishi Cunningham, Jr., et al
as 15-1199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRAD JANIKOWSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
ABISHI C. CUNNINGHAM, JR., Public Defender, MARCOS D. REYES, Chief Public Defender, JAY MILITELLO, COMMANDER and others
Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. Fernando Costello, et al
as 14-3804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR C. FOURSTAR, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FERNANDO COSTELLO, Physician Assistant, USP Marion, NEIL VAZQUEZ, Federal Medical Director, USP Marion and UNKNOWN PARTY, Day Shift Correctional Officer and Evening Shift Correctional Officer, USP Marion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
