Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Coons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04087
Plaintiff:
Matthew Coons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Coons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv04139
Plaintiff:
Matthew Coons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Haywood v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2021cv01089
Defendant:
Leonta Jackson, Mallorie Kennedy, Andrew Tilden and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Leslie et al
as 1:2020cv01326
Defendant:
. Gish, . Henry, . Coon and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Beck et al
as 2:2019cv02218
Defendant:
John A Harwood, Marylin J Beck, City of Paxton and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Clark v. Johnson-Hurst et al
as 2:2018cv02034
Plaintiff:
Tony Terell Clark
Defendant:
Tiffany D Johnson-Hurst, Robert K O'Reilly, City of Champaign Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockwood v. Foster et al
as 1:2016cv01196
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Benton Lockwood
Defendant:
Marth Jane Foster, Wilkins Insurance Agency, Foster Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. Aikman et al
as 2:2010cv02268
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Browning
Defendant:
Christopher Aikman, Matthew Iverson, Heidi VanAntwerp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hanson v. Shipley et al
as 2:2008cv02155
Plaintiff:
Simone Hanson
Defendant:
Chad Shipley, Geoffrey Coon and City of Champaign Illinois
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
