Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 466
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff: Gregory D Jones
Defendant: . Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fukama-Kabika v. Jones
as 2:2024cv02091
Petitioner: Jean A Fukama-Kabika
Respondent: Chance Jones
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff: Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant: Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Adkins et al
as 2:2024cv02057
Plaintiff: Sayvon Jones
Defendant: Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Felicia Adkins and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. Turner et al
as 3:2023cv03355
Petitioner: Jeffrey T. Jones
Respondent: Lynea Turner, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Jones v. USA
as 3:2023cv03354
Petitioner: Qwanell S Jones
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carlson v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff: Benjmain Carlson
Defendant: Adrian Ortiz, Alexandria Norville, Andrew Erikson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Jones
as 1:2023cv01428
Plaintiff: Germarco Tate
Defendant: Nick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?