Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Clark-Bey v. East Peoria Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Tony Clark-Bey
Defendant:
East Peoria Police Department and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Hale et al
as 2:2024cv02123
Plaintiff:
Katrina Wallace
Defendant:
Danielle Hale, Karyn Conner and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01411
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Lee
Defendant:
Matt Smith, Woodford County Illinois, Dennis Wertz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schweitzer v. U S Marshal Service et al
as 2:2023cv02223
Plaintiff:
Erin D Schweitzer
Defendant:
U S Marshal Service, Brown County Jail, Medical Staff at Brown County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. City of Marshall, Illinois et al
as 2:2023cv02180
Plaintiff:
Jacob Blankenship
Defendant:
City of Marshall, Illinois, . Lewis, . Regen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chacon v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
Cosme Chacon
Defendant:
. Downey and US Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurtado-Meza v. Downey et al
as 2:2023cv02106
Plaintiff:
Mario Hurtado-Meza
Defendant:
Michael Downey and U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fletcher v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Fletcher
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Terre Haute U.S.P., . Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2022cv01410
Plaintiff:
Marshall L Anderson
Defendant:
Chris Watkin, B Johnson, . Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bliven v. U S Marshall
as 3:2022cv03187
Plaintiff:
William G Bliven
Defendant:
U S Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
