Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff:
Gregoy D Jones
Defendant:
Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. DeKalb County et al
as 3:2024cv50135
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
DeKalb County, DeKalb County Sheriff's Office, Grant Ericson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Grant County Prosecutor Agency et al
as 1:2024cv02148
Petitioner:
Lloyd Brown
Respondent:
Grant County Prosecutor Agency, Grant County Probation Agency and City of Marion, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker v. Hain et al
as 1:2023cv16783
Plaintiff:
Micheal Ray Whitaker
Defendant:
Ron Hain, Matthew Squire, Edward Grant Sutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05339
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Mason v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Grant Mason
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, S Rodriguez, Daorerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Olsson v. Malis et al
as 1:2022cv06575
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Defendant:
Richard Malis, Jeff Pharris, Daniel Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv50387
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
Makala Frazier, Brad Cars, Lance Reinbolz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gambaiani v. Greene
as 1:2021cv05142
Petitioner:
Grant Gambaiani
Respondent:
Brittany Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Pocewicz et al
as 1:2021cv00636
Defendant:
Brent Pocewicz, Will County, Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
