Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Potbelly Sandwich Works, LLC v. Montalto et al
as 1:2019cv04613
Defendant:
James Hessmer, Techule, LLC, Michael Montalto and others
Plaintiff:
Potbelly Sandwich Works, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Mendoza et al v. BSB Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03952
Defendant:
Jujhar Singh and BSB Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nataly Mendoza and David Flores Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puntos et al v. Tommy's/Lake In The Hills, Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv50089
Plaintiff:
Miguel Espinoza Lozada and Alejandro Rios Puntos
Defendant:
Tommy's/Lake In The Hills, Ltd. and Donald Grieco
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Medline Industries, Inc v. Gruenepointe 1 Longview, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02325
Defendant:
GRUENEPOINTE 1 KEMP, LLC, GRUENEPOINTE HOLDINGS, LLC, OP OPS ARL TX, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Medline Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hunter v. Arriaga et al
as 1:2019cv01358
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Lammert, Lt. Brown, Deputy Sheriff Arriaga and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv04891
Defendant:
Janette Crofton, Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Plaintiff:
Freddie M Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krajnyk v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv03858
Plaintiff:
Thor Krajnyk
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Daniel Young, Efrain Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rios Velez v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv01746
Plaintiff:
Magdalena Rios Velez
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Meyers v. Rios et al
as 1:2018cv01652
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dejuan Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Rios, Warden Jimmenez and Lt. Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
