Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bull v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Jayson Bull
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., John D. Lakin, County of Madison, Illinois and others
Intervenor:
Angie Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirkpatrick v. County of Williamson, Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv02084
Plaintiff:
Elisa Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
County of Williamson, Illinois, Allen Hodapp, Brandon Zanotti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gooding v. Kahl et al
as 3:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Mary Dumbacher, Macoupin County State of Illinois, Jennifer Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gooding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv01338
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Mary Dambacher, Jennifer Watson and others
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv01324
Defendant:
John D. Jordan, Donald W. Washington, William Bar and others
Petitioner:
Derrick Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheek v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv01322
Plaintiff:
Erik Travis Cheek
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Jennifer Watson, Macoupin County State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv01307
Defendant:
John D. Jordan, William Bar, Donald W. Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Lonzo Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Kahl et al
as 3:2020cv01306
Defendant:
John D. Jordan, William Bar, Donald W. Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Q. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
