Cases 91 - 100 of 41,693
Fortman v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00389
Defendant:
Darrin Hatin and Troy Hershberger
Plaintiff:
Robert P Fortman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Laporte County Sherriffs Dept et al
as 3:2024cv00770
Defendant:
Laporte County Sherriffs Dept, LaPorte County Sheriffs Department and Quality Care Nursing Agency
Plaintiff:
Darnell Antwon Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McColly v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Inmates
Plaintiff:
Justin Allen McColly and Justin A McColly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. PJJD, LLC
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Gloriel Howard
Defendant:
PJJD, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Turner v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00618
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Akeem Turner
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lockett v. Garcia
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Cortell D Lockett
Defendant:
Gerhart and Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00317
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Blair v. Mathis et al
as 1:2024cv00309
Defendant:
Brandon Mathis, Ross, Troy Hershberger and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Blair and Charles Sauge Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sams v. Aarons Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00322
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff, Joseph Kraus and Aarons Inc.
Plaintiff:
Niquita Sams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
