Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 171 - 180 of 351
BRUMLEY v. KNIGHT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00293
Petitioner: STEVEN BRUMLEY
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAKEY v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00272
Petitioner: HERBERT BLAKEY
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CUMMINS v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00264
Petitioner: WILLIAM CUMMINS
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CUMMINS v. KNIGHT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00263
Petitioner: WILLIAM CUMMINS
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEPHENS v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00220
Defendant: STANLEY KNIGHT
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DALE STEPHENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINS v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00213
Petitioner: WILLIAM CUMMINS
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EASLEY v. KNIGHT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00116
Petitioner: KENT A. EASLEY
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MULLIS v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00112
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner: RICHARD MULLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATSON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00103
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner: KENNETH WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOK v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00098
Petitioner: HENRY COOK
Respondent: STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?