Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 240
JOHNSON v. LAPPE et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Plaintiff: CHARLES JOHNSON
Defendant: DEREK LAPPE, ANDREW DILE, VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff: Matthew Reyes and MATTHEW A. REYES
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUGGLE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv00838
Plaintiff: BRYAN P TUGGLE
Defendant: DENNIS REAGLE, CHISTOPHER ERTEL, VINCE STANLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STARR v. ANDREWS et al
as 2:2022cv00160
Plaintiff: ANTHONY STARR
Defendant: ANDREWS and J. LYTTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00412
Petitioner: ANDREW DALTON PETERSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORWOOD v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff: ANDREW DAVID NORWOOD
Defendant: BYRD and DR. RAJOLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAUL v. WATSON
as 2:2021cv00471
Petitioner: LEE ANDREW PAUL
Respondent: T.J WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
KING v. BRANHAM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03008
Plaintiff: ROGER S. KING, JR.
Defendant: MIKE BRANHAM, ANDREW VERBOCHT, JOHN COCHRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARPENTER v. FREEMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00190
Plaintiff: ANDREW J. CARPENTER
Defendant: KENNETH FREEMAN, TAYLOR MCELFRESH, RONALD HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILKE-BREIGHTLING v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2021cv02945
Petitioner: ANDREW MICHAEL WILKE-BREIGHTLING
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?