Cases 1 - 10 of 977
YARBROUGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
ANTWAINE ENTA YARBROUGH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LUCAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
DUJUAN LUCAS and DEJUAN LUCAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
MARK PRICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
HOPKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
ANTOINE HOPKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GUTIERREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00800
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO MOJICA GUTIERREZ and CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PRATT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
SHAWNDRAE R. PRATT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GABALDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
FRANK GABALDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
