Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,289
COMPTON v. GALIPEAU
as 1:2024cv01016
Petitioner: DANIEL COMPTON
Respondent: GALIPEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCROGHAM v. DUNAWAY et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JAMES SCROGHAM
Defendant: DUNAWAY, TEVIN TALBOT and DANGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff: OMAR DAVIS
Defendant: MARK MURRAY and WOLKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: MYRON S. PRUDEN, MARK C.O. COOK, SHANE C. HENDRICK and others
Defendant: W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCROGHAM v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JAMES SCROGHAM
Defendant: FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, DUNAWAY, TEVIN TALBOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARUTHERS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner: TERRELL CARUTHERS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PARKER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: GEORGE A. PARKER
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. GASKIN et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff: DERRICK HOOD
Defendant: RICHARD GASKIN and DEZARAY WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?