Cases 91 - 100 of 308
RAMSEY v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2017cv01309
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON MEDICAL, AMBER DILLOW and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. RAMSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANKINS v. NEW CASTE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv01290
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, SCOTT FITCH, SAMUEL JOSEPH and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN MICHAEL HANKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. CORIZON CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2017cv01117
Defendant:
MR. KEITH BUTTS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., CORIZON CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv01089
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOHNNY F. MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv01088
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOHNNY F. MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRISON v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv00752
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOSHUA ALLEN HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STROWMATT v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv00741
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, ROBERT CARTER, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY E. STROWMATT
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHADWICK v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv00634
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
DUSTIN T. CHADWICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHADWICK v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv00635
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
DUSTIN T. CHADWICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv00600
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOHNNY F. MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
