Cases 11 - 19 of 19
KANE v. THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01141
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KANE
Defendant:
THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HAMPTON v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00834
Plaintiff:
BETTY HAMPTON
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GREINER v. THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00569
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GREINER
Defendant:
THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DUNCAN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv02028
Respondent:
GREGORY BALLARD, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, COUNTY OF MARION and others
Petitioner:
JACKY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DUNCAN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014mc00104
Respondent:
GREGORY BALLARD, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, COUNTY OF MARION and others
Petitioner:
JACKY DUNCAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
KINSEY v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2013cv01450
Plaintiff:
LISA KINSEY
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HAWKER et al v. HESS et al
as 1:2013cv00189
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, DELAVAN E. WHITENIGHT WHOLESALE PRODUCE COMPANY, INC. and HARRY H. HESS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH T. HAWKER and MICHELE R. HAWKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
WALDROP v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP LTD GROUP POLICY et al
as 1:2011cv00169
Defendant:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP LTD GROUP POLICY and THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KAREN WALDROP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
