Cases 11 - 20 of 71,496
MILLER v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00972
Petitioner:
CHARLES MILLER
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00966
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FIELDS v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
JAY JAMES FIELDS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HENSON v. CALVARY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL et al
as 1:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
JARED MALACHI HENSON
Defendant:
CALVARY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL, CALVARY CHRISTIAN TABERNACLE CHURCH, CHARLES BARCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
HOCKEY, MARTIN, A. TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. TORRES et al
as 1:2024cv00970
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
BRITTANY A. TORRES, KYLEIGH J. INGALIS, LETICIA MARTINEZ-MATEOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARTHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Defendant:
A. SMITH and GEO/N.C.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, IDOC, C.I.C. PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZEHNER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
JOEL ZEHNER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RESSLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RESSLER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
