Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Sanders, Christopher v. Lundmark
as 3:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Sanders
Defendant:
Lundmark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders, Christopher v. Pugh, Jeff et al
as 3:2011cv00202
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Sanders
Defendant:
Jeff Pugh and Sears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foley, David v. Haley, Debra et al
as 3:2010cv00382
Plaintiff:
David P. Foley
Defendant:
Debra K. Haley, Sheri Hicks, Jean Kraintz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders, Ricky v. Holinka, Carol et al
as 3:2010cv00173
Petitioner:
Ricky A. Sanders
Respondent:
Carol Holinka and Issac Fulwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANDERS, JOHN W. v. USA
as 3:2010cv00166
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
John W. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sanders v. Schneider et al
as 3:2009cv00673
Plaintiff:
Gerald Sanders
Defendant:
James Schneider, Eric Holder and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pilcher v. U.S. Federal Court, Greenville, MS et al
as 3:2009cv00627
Petitioner:
Orlando Lewayne Pilcher
Respondent:
U.S. Federal Court, Greenville, MS, Allen Pepper Jr. & Administration, Ricky Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanders v. Shinseki et al
as 3:2009cv00623
Plaintiff:
Gerald Sanders
Defendant:
Eric Shinseki and Debra Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Director: U.S. Selective Service System
as 3:2009cv00622
Plaintiff:
Gerald Sanders
Defendant:
Director: U.S. Selective Service System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Paquin
as 3:2009cv00472
Petitioner:
Reginald L. Sanders, Sr.
Respondent:
John Paquin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
