Cases 101 - 110 of 207
900 North Michigan, LLC v. Lillie Inc.
as 1:2015cv07856
Defendant:
Lillie, Inc.
Plaintiff:
900 North Michigan, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belda v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2015cv07544
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mary Beth Belda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
504 Redevelopment LLC v. Prime Investment Management Corporation
as 2:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
504 Redevelopment LLC
Defendant:
SBA Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. DeBroux
as 2:2015cv00882
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Judith Miller DeBroux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
KLOECKNER METALS CORPORATION v. PORTS OF INDIANA, et al
as 4:2015cv00092
Defendant:
ESTATE PRODUCTS, INC. and PORTS OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
KLOECKNER METALS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Wells et al v. Bank Of America Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv06229
Plaintiff:
Walter Wells, Jean Allen and Tiana Wells Green
Defendant:
Bank Of America Corp., Safeguard Property and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Housing Authority of the City of South Bend, Indiana v. Herndon
as 3:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
The Housing Authority of the City of South Bend, Indiana and Joann Watford
Defendant:
Cynthia Herndon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ECP SOUTH PERRY ROAD, LLC v. LHRG, INC
as 1:2015cv00714
Plaintiff:
ECP SOUTH PERRY ROAD, LLC
Defendant:
LHRG, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
WYATT et al v. APTER et al
as 1:2015cv00450
Defendant:
GARY M. APTER, APTER PROPERTIES and JOHN DOES
Plaintiff:
ARLISHER HARVEY and CHAUNCEY C. WYATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
