Cases 101 - 110 of 139
Hull v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2011cv00310
Plaintiff:
Henry D Hull
Defendant:
David Gilbert, Mark Stefanatos, Jason Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SRIVASTAVA v. PAYNE et al
as 1:2011cv00909
Defendant:
KENDALE ADAMS, EVAN BAYH, GERALD BEPKO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hull v. Wells et al
as 1:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
Henry D Hull
Defendant:
Jeff Wells, Mark Stefanatos, Darrell Himelck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huon v. Mudge et al
as 1:2011cv03050
Plaintiff:
Meanith Huon
Defendant:
William Mudge, Thomas Gibbons, Chris Hoell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staten v. Jones et al
as 3:2011cv00270
Plaintiff:
James Staten
Defendant:
Jones and Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olson v. Edwards et al
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Christine Ann Olson
Defendant:
James Edwards, Izericki, Pappas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wells v. Spears et al
as 1:2011cv01025
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Wells, Sr
Defendant:
Robert M Spears, Office of the Peoria County Circuit Clerk and Unknown Employees of Peoria County Circuit Clerks Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2010cv00138
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, DARRELL MILLS and EUGENE D. PERROT
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilbert Land Development, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Jennings Wells et al
as 2:2010cv02246
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Land Development Inc
Defendant:
Suzanne Jennings Wells, W E Excavating Inc and Kelly Finet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01235
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL ESTATE OF CANNON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., KATHY EDRINGTON, JOE HANSEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
