Cases 181 - 190 of 31,475
Igwe v. Macon County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
Daniel Igwe
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Office, Brad Patient, Joseph Pearcy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kacar v. City of Skokie et al
as 1:2024cv03894
Plaintiff:
Faruk Kacar
Defendant:
City of Skokie, City Of Chicago and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wheeler et al v. State of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03933
Plaintiff:
Rev. Wheeler, Jr., Mamie Till Mobley and Tyrone Hunt
Defendant:
The State of Chicago and The State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
DALE et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
KEYON DALE and LAMONTAY AYERS
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirby v. Gasaway Distributors Inc.
as 1:2024cv03999
Plaintiff:
Jeannine Kirby
Defendant:
Gasaway Distributors Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cage v. Kipp Academy Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03966
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY CAGE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
KIPP ACADEMY CHICAGO and DONNELL MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castillo-lara v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01274
Plaintiff:
Lynda M. Castillo-Lara
Defendant:
Maisie King and Aaron Wise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Polzin, Michael v. Kelm, Kerry et al
as 3:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Polzin
Defendant:
Kerry Kelm, Jonathan Lundeen and Andrew Maki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Hutchinson v. Jeffrey Kelling
as 24-1847
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. HUTCHINSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY KELLING
Atrella Reynolds v. Scottrade, Inc./TD Ameritrade, Inc., et al
as 24-1842
Plaintiff:
ATRELLA REYNOLDS
Defendant:
SCOTTRADE, INC./TD AMERITRADE, INC., CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
