Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Neuman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 1:2012cv06907
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Plaintiff:
Candy Neuman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
Bridget Harper
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walowski v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 1:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Jason Walowski
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. Wal-Mart et al
as 1:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Brett Walters
Defendant:
Wal-Mart and Benjamin Browden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00031
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ann Wilt
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Milton et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv07872
Plaintiff:
Dominic Milton and Christine Earnest
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , The Village of Gurnee Police Department, an Illinoiso Municipal Corp. , The Village of Island Lake Police Department, an Illinois Municipal Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rasras v. City of Kewanee, an Illinois Local Governmental Entity et al
as 4:2011cv04060
Plaintiff:
Awad R. Rasras
Defendant:
City of Kewanee, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Stephen Kijanowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasras v. City of Kewanee, an Illinois Local Governmental Entity et al
as 1:2011cv01294
Plaintiff:
Awad R. Rasras
Defendant:
City of Kewanee, an Illinois Local Governmental Entity, Stephen Kijanowski, a City of Kewanee Police Officer in His Individual Capacity, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2011cv04848
Plaintiff:
Roberto Jimenez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Neal v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 2:2011cv00329
Plaintiff:
Antonio Neal
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
