Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Harris v. Whitcher
as 1:2015cv07591
Plaintiff:
Clifford Harris
Defendant:
Jennifer Whitcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Clifford Cozad v. John Brooke, et al
as 15-2720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD COZAD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN H. BROOKE, LAW OFFICES OF JOHN H. BROOKE LLC, EMMY H. STONE and others
Mark D. Schwartz, et al v. Blaylock Robert Vann, LLC, et al
as 15-1650
Plaintiff:
FRANK CLIFFORD PAUL
Appellant:
MARK D. SCHWARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAYLOCK ROBERT VANN, LLC, ERIC V. STANDIFER and AQUACENA LOPEZ
Anthony Johnson, et al v. City of Bloomington, Illinois, et al
as 14-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, WILLIAM A. HOSEA, III, ERIC TAPLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS, ANDREW CHAMBERS, Officer, SARA MAYER, Officer and others
Cozad v. Brooke et al
as 2:2014cv02207
Plaintiff:
Clifford Cozad
Defendant:
John H Brooke, Law Offices of John H Brooke LLC, Emmy H Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford Cerutti v. USPS, et al
as 14-2726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD CERUTTI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and PHIL, Letter Carrier
Mangerson v. Village of Park Forest et al.
as 1:2014cv04661
Defendant:
Village of Park Forest , Clifford Butz , Michael Baugh and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Mangerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dix v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv03620
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dix
Defendant:
Mark J. Sullivan , Janet Napolitano , Julia Pierson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOFFMAN et al v. JACOBI et al
as 4:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
AMY BENNETT, JAMES BENNETT, NATHAN CLIFFORD and others
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, HENRY FORD, DANIELLE GRISSETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEELEY v. CALDWELL et al
as 2:2014cv00022
Defendant:
ROBERT W BAESLER, TANYA BELL, CLIFFORD CALDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SEELEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
