Cases 31 - 40 of 51
THURMAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2012cv01523
Defendant:
ALL APPEALS COURT CLERKS, JACOB ANTANGA, CYNTHIA AYERS and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON THURMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Round Lake Area School District No. 116
as 1:2012cv07921
Plaintiff:
Nikiya Nelson
Defendant:
Round Lake Area School District No. 116, Ryan Hawkins and Ray Porten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fairley et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv05222
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Mayor Rahm Emmanuel
Plaintiff:
Hawkins Fairley and Beverly Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAGGARD v. TOWN OF FISHERS et al
as 1:2012cv00744
Defendant:
Officer JASON ARNOLD, Officer LISA GARRETT, Officer GARRISON and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDI HAGGARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRUCK v. TOWN OF FISHERS et al
as 1:2011cv01521
Defendant:
Officer J. HAWKINS, Officer RYAN JONES and TOWN OF FISHERS
Plaintiff:
SCOTT E. STRUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andre Jackson v. Tim Osburn, et al
as 11-1514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE W. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM OSBURN, Vigo County Jail Commander, JOHN MARVEL and KIM HAWKINS, Assistant Jail Commander
DOE v. MARVEL et al
as 2:2010cv00344
Defendant:
JEREMY DAVIS, BRIAN DAWSON, GREG EWING and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE v. MARVEL et al
as 1:2010cv01316
Defendant:
JEREMY DAVIS, BRIAN DAWSON, KIM HAWKINS and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2010cv02111
Defendant:
Rodney S Mitchell, James M Bowersock and City of Champaign Illinois
Plaintiff:
William K Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mario Hawkins v. Michael Randle, et al
as 10-2229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO D. HAWKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. RANDLE, JORGE L. MONTES and JOHN & JANE DOES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
