Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Bussie v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv10276
Plaintiff:
Charda Bussie
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Michael Vasquez, Phillip Kwasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calixte v. Village of Glenview et al
as 1:2015cv06285
Plaintiff:
Hubert Calixte
Defendant:
Village of Glenview and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haymer v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv04504
Plaintiff:
Eric Haymer
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department, Officer Preg and Unknown Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcus Williams v. P.O. Carter, #16352 et al
as 1:2015cv03511
Plaintiff:
Marcus Williams
Defendant:
P.O. Bishop, P.O. Carter, Officers John Doe and others
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lane v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv01920
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lane
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Officer John Doe and Officer Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv08296
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart , Cara Smith , Sharon A. Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark J. Neiweem v. Officer Carter et al
as 1:2014cv06116
Defendant:
Officer Carter, Officer Carol, Officer Hodgeman and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Neiweem
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KONCHINSKY v. DIAZ et al
as 1:2014cv01078
Defendant:
RANDY DIAZ, IMPD OFFICER JOHN DOE, I, IMPD OFFICER JOHN DOE, II and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA KONCHINSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCray et al v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2014cv01308
Plaintiff:
Dejohn McCray and Chicago Police Officer John Doe
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Minor v. Officers John Doe 1-2
as 1:2014cv00616
Plaintiff:
Bodarius Minor
Defendant:
Officers John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
