Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Hawkins v. Randle et al
as 1:2010cv02083
Plaintiff:
Mario D. Hawkins
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Jorge L. Montes and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Craig v. Hawkins
as 1:2009cv07099
Plaintiff:
Patricia Craig
Defendant:
Sgt. Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hawkins
as 1:2009cv06434
Plaintiff:
Eric Hawkins and Eric Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hawkins et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv01574
Plaintiff:
Wille Mae Hawkins, Vickie Champion, Donna Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago and John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edwards v. THURMER et al
as 3:2008cv00352
Plaintiff:
Terrance Edwards
Defendant:
MICHAEL THURMER, JEREMY STANIEC, Joe Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins et al v. EMS Property Management et al
as 1:2007cv00336
Plaintiff:
Charles Hawkins and Shaynna Hawkins
Defendant:
EMS Property Management, Scott Berkey, Mark Berkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv06198
Plaintiff:
Ricky Hawkins and Ricky Hawkins
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, J Perez, M. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. City of Kenosha et al
as 2:2007cv00712
Plaintiff:
Steve Hawkins and Steve Hawkins
Defendant:
City of Kenosha, Daniel C Wade, Lewis Lindquist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eason et al v. Illinois Dept of Children & Family Services et al
as 3:2007cv50015
Plaintiff:
Larry Eason
Defendant:
Illinois Dept of Children & Family Services, Ruth Nolan, Ruth Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Zaruba et al
as 1:2007cv00580
Plaintiff:
Marty Harris
Defendant:
John E Zaruba, John E Zaruba, Patrick O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
