Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Jane Doe v. Richard Macleod, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MARGARET BURKE, TODD SEXTON and RICHARD MACLEOD
John Burks v. Jason Tate, et al
as 24-1933
Plaintiff:
JOHN BURKS
Defendant:
JASON TATE, MATTHEW WIERZCHOWSKI and ROSS LAUTENBACH
Johnson, Remus et al v. School District of Rhinelander Board of Education et al
as 3:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Remus Johnson and Brooke Johnson Paquette
Defendant:
School District of Rhinelander Board of Education and Eric Burke
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX
Jane Doe v. Margaret Burke, et al
as 23-3060
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellant:
MARGARET BURKE and TODD SEXTON
Carmen Consolino, et al v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 23-2968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMEN CONSOLINO, CYNTHIA CHUBB, ANTONIO BELK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, ZELDA WHITTLER, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Carmen Consolino, et al v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 23-2967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARMEN CONSOLINO, CYNTHIA CHUBB, ANTONIO BELK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, ZELDA WHITTLER, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Anderson et al v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
John Mann Anderson, Patrick Korkowski, Kenneth Dalberg and others
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Burks v. Jason Tate, et al
as 23-1736
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BURKS
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON TATE, MATTHEW WIERZCHOWSKI and ROSS LAUTENBACH
James v. U.S. Government's David Burke
as 1:2022cv04333
Plaintiff:
Bill James
Defendant:
U.S. Government's David Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bill James v. David Burke
as 22-2504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILL JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BURKE, U.S. Government's
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
