Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MOORE v. KERN et al
as 1:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. MOORE
Defendant:
MARIE KERN, MEGAN L. GEHRING, KRISTY L. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eitenmiller et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Joshua Eitenmiller, Nina Eitenmiller, Gregory Gurski and others
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOORE v. CHAVIS
as 1:2022cv01783
Plaintiff:
BRIAN S. MOORE
Defendant:
JOHN M.T. CHAVIS, MELISSICA FLIPPEN, ALEYNE WOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Cotton v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
Mark A Cotton
Defendant:
David M Gilbert, John Kauffman, Ben McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Manchester College
as 3:2011cv00443
Plaintiff:
James L Moore, Jr
Defendant:
Manchester College
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen Moore v. Thomas Monahan, et al
as 10-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN L. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS MONAHAN, DARRELL SANDERS, TARRY WILLIAMS and others
Moore et al v. Gary City of Police Department et al
as 2:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
James L Moore and Alecia Fonseca
Defendant:
Gary City of Police Department, Sergeant Martinez Newman and William Hunt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lesmeister et al
as 3:2009cv50115
Plaintiff:
Jeremy L. Moore
Defendant:
Aaron Lesmeister, Ryan Marko, Rockford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Curry v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv00938
Plaintiff:
Kim Curry, Kim Curry, Kim Curry and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, J. L. Moore and Harry Strong
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOORE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2008cv01647
Plaintiff:
TOMMY L. MOORE
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, FRANK ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
