Cases 11 - 20 of 376
Ventura v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50127
Petitioner:
Henry Ventura
Respondent:
Warden B. Lammer and Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 3:2024cv50138
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent:
Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Brion B Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Olivares Venegas v. McLean County Sheriff Office
as 1:2024cv01070
Petitioner:
Jonathan B Olivares Venegas
Respondent:
McLean County Sheriff Office and Matt Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown, Jr. v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50104
Petitioner:
Rickey Dale Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Timothy Gentry v. Randall Hepp
as 23-3321
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY B. GENTRY
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDALL HEPP
Johnson v. Northern District of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv03856
Petitioner:
Jerome R. Johnson
Respondent:
Northern District of Illinois and J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoskins v. Lammer
as 3:2023cv50443
Petitioner:
Walter Hoskins
Respondent:
B. Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Solberg v. Hachey et al
as 2:2023cv01590
Petitioner:
John M Solberg
Respondent:
C Hachey, J Kozulla and B Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
