General Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 58
King v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00358
Petitioner: Danny King
Respondent: Warden
Not Yet Classified: INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Lashbrook
as 1:2018cv01939
Petitioner: Derrick E King
Respondent: J Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00540
Petitioner: JAMES KING
Respondent: J.E. KRUEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
KING v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00406
Respondent: RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner: JOENATHAN KING
Miscellaneou: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. GRIFFIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01348
Respondent: KATHY GRIFFIN
Petitioner: GEORGE KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Madigan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00240
Petitioner: King Michael Oliver
Respondent: Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melvin Bell v. USA
as 16-2893
Petitioner - Appellant: MELVIN T. BELL, also known as MINISTER SOVEREIGN KING BEY
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
King v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00732
Petitioner: Mario King
Respondent: Judy Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Werlich We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00300
Petitioner: Christopher King
Respondent: T Werlich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Oliver v. David Herndon, et al
as 16-1508
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL OLIVER, also known as KING MICHAEL OLIVER
Respondent - Appellee: DAVID R. HERNDON, Judge, TIMOTHY TINY, Public Defender, SERGEANT SCOTT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?