General Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 246
HANKINS v. BUTTS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00360
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JONATHON MICHAEL HANKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roderick Bunnell v. Keith Butts
as 16-4149
Petitioner - Appellant: RODERICK BUNNELL
Respondent - Appellee: KEITH BUTTS
MANLEY v. BUTTS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv03292
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODRING v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv03222
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: BRIAN WOODRING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAILEY v. BUTTS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02625
Petitioner: LUCAS BAILEY
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MANLEY v. BUTTS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02586
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DRUMMOND v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv02489
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: DAVID DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALKER v. BUTTS
as 1:2016cv02490
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: CHARLES WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POSEY v. BUTTS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02425
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: SEAN E. POSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Manley v. Keith Butt
as 16-3386
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES E. MANLEY
Respondent - Appellee: KEITH BUTTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?