Cases 1 - 10 of 26,567
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01209
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00966
Petitioner:
DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent:
T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FIELDS v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
JAY JAMES FIELDS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Powell v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01457
Petitioner:
James Powell
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00707
Petitioner:
Jermel Robertson
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00972
Petitioner:
CHARLES MILLER
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Mitchell
as 3:2024cv50218
Plaintiff:
Marvin Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nance v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01444
Petitioner:
James Lawrence Nance
Respondent:
Thomas Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anthony-El v. Circuit Court of the twentieth Judicial Circuit et al
as 3:2024cv01448
Petitioner:
Javier Anthony-El
Respondent:
Circuit Court of the twentieth Judicial Circuit, State of Illinois and Jesse Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
