Cases 21 - 30 of 41
POPP v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00172
Plaintiff:
CHARLES POPP
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, KIMBERLY HOBSON, JACKIE WEST-DENNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Brown et al
as 3:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Dante Guy and Dante D Guy
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Richard Brown, John Doe and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2019cv05032
Defendant:
AMBER WALLACE, ROBERT CARTER and RICHARD BROWN
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LACEY v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv04123
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL, RICHARD BROWN and DAVID WALKER
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAY LACEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burnett v. Kelsey et al
as 3:2019cv00673
Defendant:
J Lyttle, A. Kelsey, Kristine St. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Keith Burnett, Jr
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREGORY v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2019cv00399
Defendant:
S. ORNDORFF, C. NICHOLSON, DAVID BEDWELL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K GREGORY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Bedwell et al
as 3:2019cv00631
Defendant:
S Orndorff, David Bedwell, C Nicholson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael K Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRY v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2018cv01006
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, KIM HOBSON, FRANK LITTLEJOHN and others
Plaintiff:
JASON SETH PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIFFLER v. BROWN
as 2:2016cv00234
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, JOHN DOE and LITTLEJOHN
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP LIFFLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIKSICH v. CORIZON INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00206
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, SAMUEL BYRD, WILLIAM L CARR and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J NIKSICH
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
