Cases 61 - 70 of 178
SHAABAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv04038
Plaintiff:
SHAABAN HAFIZ AHMAD ALI SHAABAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barrett, Brock et al v. Itstein, Joe et al
as 3:2017cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brock B. Barrett and Suzanne A. (Hogan) Kent-Barrett
Defendant:
Joe Itstein, Kris Kiel and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burton v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv04354
Plaintiff:
Roderick V Burton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv02909
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sanders
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv02051
Plaintiff:
Javon Edward Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America, Jerome Combs Detention Center, Chad Kolitwenzew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Petragallo et al
as 1:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Johnny Darnell Bradshaw
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cedric J. Smith v. USA
as 16-4085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC J. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CENSKE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv02761
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ANDREW CENSKE
Federal Bureau Of Prisons Officials In USP Terre Haute:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Daddono v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv06418
Plaintiff:
William Daddono
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Marshall Service , Stephen S. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILMORE v. DECKER et al
as 2:2016cv00209
Defendant:
T. BAILEY, TRACY BIXLER, GENEVIEVE DAUGHTERY and others
Plaintiff:
AMAR GILMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
