Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Grandberry, Rico v. Eplette, Cheryl et al
as 3:2021cv00742
Plaintiff:
Rico John Grandberry
Defendant:
Warden Cheryl Eplette, Beckie Blodgett, Shanon Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez, Gabriel v. State of Wisconsin, Dane County et al
as 3:2020cv01027
Defendant:
Deputy Zachary A. Sween, Deputy Lacey M. Kranski, B. Wiersma and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel G. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Giese et al
as 2:2020cv00493
Defendant:
CO Washington, Angela Wallenhaupt, Lt Salsbury and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Omar Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rives v. Wilson et al
as 3:2019cv01025
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Mark Luther, John Vahle, Marion County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Frank D Rives, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2019cv05467
Defendant:
N. Walker, Patrick Munyon, Kim M Foxx and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Richard Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Slattery Boyle et al
as 1:2019cv01300
Plaintiff:
Randolph Mays
Defendant:
Maura Slattery Boyle, Robort Kline and Emily Leuin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartshorn v. Sauver et al
as 2:2016cv01226
Plaintiff:
Henry W Hartshorn
Defendant:
Jerome Sauver, Chris Lesperance, Steph Timblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Boyle v. Wettengel et al
as 2:2016cv00969
Plaintiff:
Ryan P O'Boyle
Defendant:
Georgina R Wettengel, Sgt Piojda, Daniel Slettmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Boyle v. Carrasco et al
as 2:2016cv00959
Plaintiff:
Ryan P O'Boyle
Defendant:
Gilbert Carrasco, Barbara O'Leary, Kristopher M Maduscha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. McLean County Detention Facilities et al
as 1:2016cv01187
Plaintiff:
Martell D Ward
Defendant:
McLean County Detention Facilities and T Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
